they're either allowed to drive or banned from it
By: Dan Keegan
Date: Monday, 01. March 2010
Tailgating is not just a safety problem, It’s also a social problem. We human drivers are very social critters, and along with that goes a territorial element of our makeup that makes us respond to space around us in ways that vary from individual to individual and from culture to culture.
That means that when you or I look in the rear view mirror and see that car behind looming large, our reactions can vary depending on individual psychology, circumstances, and what we perceive to be accepted norms and rules.
In other words, when it comes to tailgating and whether other vehicles are too close or too aggressive, there are no absolute fixed rules, at least not as far as individual perceptions are concerned.
That could explain why those two police highway patrol cars zoomed out on to the New York State Thruway recently and headed for the fast lane, where they ‘tailgated’ one another, and cars in front, for a mile or two. Mind you, they might have had a motive - a police car in your mirror is a pretty good reason to move over, even if their lights are not flashing.
All that aside, “following too close,” in addition to being a social problem, is regarded as a major traffic safety issue. Consequently, over the years, safety experts and driver educators have worked out rules.
The first of these was the car length rule. This was a rule of thumb decreeing that for every 10 mph of speed the following distance should be one car length. At 20 mph, following distance would be two car lengths, and at 60 mph six car lengths.Click here to see animation
Later this gave way to the more scientific 2-second rule. This means being two seconds behind the car ahead, and it was applicable to any speed. Two seconds in stop and go traffic might be a car length or two but at highway speeds it would be much more.
The 2-second rule is loosely based on perception and reaction time. If the driver ahead slams on the brakes it will take a certain amount of time to see it’s happening, and then some more time to react (foot from gas pedal to brake). If you don’t begin braking before you reach the point as which the driver in front began (assuming both sets of brakes are equally powerful) then, in theory at least, you hit the car ahead.
Driver education textbooks used to estimate perception and reaction time as about half to three quarters of a second each. The rest might be described as ‘safety margin.’
As simple as it sounded, principles of the 2-second rule were not always clear to either student drivers or their instructors.
As a case in point, some years back chevrons were painted on a very busy motorway near Toronto, Canada, as a way to demonstrate how far cars should be apart at the 100 km/hr speed limit of the highway. They received much criticism as a “distraction” to drivers. Drivers, the critics said, should not be looking down at the pavement when moving in busy traffic, but rather eyes up and far ahead.
The critics missed the point. the 2-second rule is not something to be counted out frequently as you drive but rather a way to gain a sense of what two seconds looks like at different speeds. Better is to have a passenger check the following time and tell the driver.
Some driving instructors say they will test a student by asking them how many seconds following distance they have, but they want the answer immediately. In other words, the student should not start counting but make a practiced guess, based on previous counting.
“If the student starts counting I tell them to forget it,” says one long-time instructor. “I tell them to practice it on the bus or while a passenger with their parents.”
You’re in the ‘passing’ lane and you’re passing, but the driver behind wants you to pass faster, so you’ve got a tailgater on your rear bumper. Well OK, so now you’re in the middle lane with space on both sides and still you’ve got a tailgater. This one is probably just absent-minded, or just lazily following your rear fender. Later, you’re in busy multi-lane traffic and everybody is tailgating, but maybe in this case they’re just defending their territory, not wanting anyone to get into the lane ahead of them.
One of the most foolish and extreme reasons for tailgating is the “slipstreaming” argument. Somehow the driver behind thinks it’s worth the extra risk of tailgating to save a little fuel. Car drivers have been known to do this behind large trucks. The problem is, apart from the risk of collision, reduced visual field for the car driver normally means far less ability to anticipate.
At the funny end of the tailgating spectrum is a case of parking lot cheating from Singapore
In this case, the first car pays for the parking while the “buddy” car sneaks in so close behind that the gate system can’t catch it. Probably not too many crashes with this one, unless it’s the parking gate coming down on the roof of the second car.
However, these examples just offer a sense of the scope of the problem. The reality of driving is that the full range of human emotions and rationalizations is involved. you could have an enraged maniac on your tail, a psychopath, a calculating bully, an overly intimate fellow traveller, or evan a doctor on the way to an emergency.
It may even be simply someone who doesn’t understand the dynamics of following closely.
Car lengths and 2-second rules are useful tools but basically they are minimum safety margin rules.
In later manifestations the 2-second rule became the 3-second, then the 4-second, even the 5 second rule. But what really counts in following distance is what kind of a driver you want to be. In terms of driving dynamics anything less than 3 - 4- seconds means that the vehicle ahead occupies so much of your visual time that your driving tactics and strategy will be dramatically effected.
The physics of tailgating is closely related to the physiology and psychology of vision and perception. It takes time to see what you need to see, and if you need to see more, then you need more time, and that means more space.
There’s been much research over the years into how drivers see. We know now that drivers are not looking where they are going all the time. In fact that’s just not possible. Instead, our eyes dart about to wherever we think is most important in our visual field, pulling in bits of information, evaluating them, darting about again.
We know also that there’s a huge psychological element to this, based on each driver’s experience and abilities. We know, as well, not every driver’s eyes are the same physically. Individuals have to deal with everything from shortsightedness to color blindness, and even visual styles that determine what we are likely to see and what we are not.
In the real world of following distance, the farther back you are determines how much your eyes can move around, how much information you can pull in, what level of driving tactics you can achieve.
‘Situational awareness’ has become a hot term in driving circles in recent years. You could say that in driving there are three levels of situational awareness.
At the most immediate level, the driver is aware of little more than those objects or events that directly affect them - the car they’re following, for example.
At the next level, the driver has awareness of what’s affecting those objects or events that are most immediate - for example, what problems are affecting the driver ahead.
At the top level, a level of very expanded awareness akin to aspects of zen, the driver is sensitive to what’s affecting the first two levels.
The third level of driver, or zen driver, if we want to call it that, is a super sensitive, super skilled, very relaxed and controlled state in which the driver is using high levels of techniques, tactics, strategies. It’s probably not a state that can be achieved by very many drivers for anything more than short periods.
In fact, it’s likely that the vast majority of drivers oscillate between levels one and two and never, despite years of experience, reach level three. One important reason for that is that level three requires intellectual ability, combined with education and training at a level which is rarely available.
Laws against tailgating are easy to pass but not easy to enforce.
It’s not just the distance between vehicles that’s the issue. There’s also the length of time, and the circumstances. A driver slides into the lane ahead of you. Now you’re tailgating. Should you try to get away, slow down, disrupt the flow of traffic? If a patrol cop spots you should you get a ticket if you linger too long?
Obviously it’s the more aggressive tailgaters that are the real issue. Establishing a case against a tailgater would require observation over time and establishing that the tailgater has shown a pattern of tailgating behavior.
Undoubtedly the latest technologies will make this not only feasible but easy. Traffic tracking technologies already enable the tracking of speed and traffic flow, so why not following distance?
There could be all kinds of objections to using technologies in this way. However,privacy concerns notwithstanding, undoubtedly technology will play a serious role in the future of tailgating as a driving style.
Imagine you’re the quintessential ‘zen driver.’ You know what’s in front of the car ahead of you, and ahead of the one in front of that. You’ve taken note of the number of cars and amount of space in each lane. You’re aware of that car coming up behind, and you know the driver will probably want to get in front of you (past behavior predicts future behavior). You’re also aware of a myriad of other details, such as the bus that may stop, the truck that may turn into the warehouse (it’s got the name on the side), and the timing of lights, road construction, etc. You’re checking two or three traffic lights ahead and noted when they turned green or red.
Can you keep that up? Probably not, at least not continuously. But with training, this level of driving can be achieved to an increasing degree. With training and practice,your human brain can handle much more than you think.
Will it be very intense, destroying your enjoyment of that pleasant commute to work with the radio as company? No reason why it should be. In fact the high level of driving skill described above should be far more relaxing, not to mention safer.
As you scan through the various articles on Drivers.com, particularly the sections on technology and the intelligent highway system, you will find the bits and pieces of the technological world that will bring to us, at some time in the future, the driverless car.
In that, perhaps not too distant future, here’s how things might work.
Your car will know the speed and direction of nearby vehicles because vehicles will exchange information. It will know the location of stop signs and traffic lights because it will also be exchanging information with those. It will know when the traffic lights changed color, how long the red will last, if there’s a red-light-runner coming through. It will also know about traffic patterns, congestion, road construction, surface conditions.
This technological Zen Driverless vehicle will, in theory at any rate, always operate in level three. Information will stream at it from sensors in road surfaces, mobile phones, traffic managers, satellites, other vehicles, and from roadway features such as signs, signals and markings that are also equipped to communicate.
It will know how to get to its destination - by the fastest route, the most eco-friendly route, the most scenic route. It may even be able to decide whether the trip is a good idea or not.
However, a driverless car world does not necessarily mean a driverless world. We humans like our driving too much for that.
Showing 1 - 15 comments
they're either allowed to drive or banned from it
I take the view that tailgating does not exist, but only as a consequence of aggressive driving and/or road rage. In the general travel more closely than the 2 sec rule, the distance will be enough to discourage cutting-in where you would have two tailgaters. Cutting-in is the villain not tailgating
what about the real slow driver who drive in fast lane on motorway ?there are a plenty,big queue behind nobody in front for miles ????
Should people who have a history of dangerous driving behavior be required to drive minimally powered, sub-compact cars?
That is if they are still allowed to drive at all.
that would be nice just reading this reminds me of the audi scene in I robot starring Will Smith. Can anybody say p.l.u.g. ?
People tailgate because they just don't care at all about the danger to others. Selfish inconsideration and hyper-impatience is the new religion of the new entitled population. We are all so impressed by the tailgating drivers busy schedules and self induced priorities by all means keep showing us your true colors at least we know who the jerks are. People who tailgate so much more important than everyone else right?
Here's an app that lets you vent your road rage and rate bad drivers online http://www.driver-ratings.com
tailgating = car crash....
if you are tailgating, its more likely that if a sudden stop appears you will crash into the car in front of you. almost everytime i reach the highway there are cops around and cars right up my rear end. so, why dont police enforce this rule on highways?
I woul like to report a reckless driver..What should I do?
Of course, if you happen to be in the left lane and the right lane is more or less clear, you should reallly think whether you are essentially preventing other drivers from going by... especially if there are several cars behind you. If that's the case, be courteous and lane-change right, and let other drivers get to where they're going. They may actualy be dealing with a real emergency.
I happened to own a Lexus IS about six years ago, and this particular model of Lexus had rear fog lights -- when turned on, they were very bright and very red. Some tailgating drivers would mistake them for brake lights and back off quickly. But I suspect that for most tailgaters, the lights were so bright and so red, that it triggered an instinctive reaction and they would ease off and maintain their distance. Sadly, the newer IS Lexus models do not feature this, but I wish car manufacturers would consider incorporating rear fog lights into their car design. In addition to providing warning at a distance in fog, they work very well at communicating your concern to drivers behind you.
Thanks for this wonderful article
I think this textbook is very educational and I also think that people who are just learning how to drive should read this textbook.
On 1 Mar 2010, at 17:34, Mapstrap@aol.com wrote:
One aspect omitted from the very good article by Dan Keegan.
The OPPOSITE of tailgating. Frontgating if you will. Example: Interstate 80, Sacramento California to Reno Nevada in the winter ski season, with much slush on the road. Fridays, with much traffic in the Reno bound lanes with skiers and gamblers headed eastbound. It is impossible to keep far enough behind the car ahead to avoid his rooster tail because idiots keep passing you and jumping into the gap. There is no common sense here, and they certainly don't arrive at the destination any more than a few seconds earlier. Meanwhile, all concerned drive in reduced visibility with the wipers going and finally run out of wiper fluid.
This is as much of a distraction as the tailgaters, and a very big driving hazard. Most are simply ignorant, uneducated drivers hopped up in anticipation of a fun weekend with no awareness at all of what they are doing. This needs to go into the driver manual.